OK it wasnÂ´t my intention to go so hard I`m SORRY for that!
Subject: [LUG] RE: OT : Emagic Sucks????
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:23:20 -0800
1) Logic and Emagic's other products all work with AMD processors.
There are *MANY* people on this list who have their setup working with
AMD processors. Even Michael Haydn at Emagic has an AMD based system,
and obviously it's working fine for him.
2) Asking REPETITIVELY for information doesn't necessarily guarantee
that you'll get it. Emagic is not OBLIGATED to respond to certain
threads on this list, or even this list in general. Consider it a
privilege that certain people from Emagic respond at all. From watching
threads on this list, it seems as if three major people from Emagic
contribute to this list: Sascha Kujawa (beta test coordinator), Michael
Haydn (developer), and Markus Fritze (developer). These guys mainly
respond to threads that interest them. If your thread doesn't interest
them, you're shit out of luck. If asking once for Emagic's collective
PC configurations (which is a lot of data to collect, by the way...)
doesn't yield any results, STOP ASKING. You're not going to get
anywhere. The best options are to ask multiple people on this list and
find out what works, and what doesn't. Don't ask for *complete*
configuration information in an easy to use, 1-2-3 step instruction
list. This is a user supported list, and nobody's being paid for
3) There are shitloads of users on this list who love Emagic, myself
included. Whining and moaning about how Emagic sucks, when they don't,
just shows how juvenile you are. Besides, most users ignore threads
like this... so typing it won't really do anything but make you feel
better (temporarily). So Emagic has a few faults, what company doesn't?
Learn to give constructive criticism, because that's the only way you'll
make a difference.
4) Lack of professionalism? Become a software developer, where
deadlines exist, and companies are forced to make decisions about what
features to include or not include all the time. In the grand scheme of
things, multiple outs for VST instruments are NOT THE END OF THE WORLD.
People used Logic for years without multiple outs for VST instruments.
Delaying it for a few months will NOT MATTER IN THE ***SLIGHTEST***. If
you're writing music while thinking about this feature, or if you plan
entire songs around it, that's just dumb. If you care so much about
this feature, move to Cubase. Hint hint, you'll regret it.
5) "I want the specs for it soundcard ram size etc!!" See above, #2.
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:48:05 +0100
From: "Alvaro Villalobos" <logicuser2001 at hotmail dot com>
Subject: OT : Emagic Sucks????
IÂ´m sorry but I can say IÂ´m a "little" bit dissapointed with Emagic!!
Emagic should get their stuff to work with AMD exactly like Steinberg
the problem isnÂ´t the people at Emagic good enough for this task or will
see a lack of proffesionalism again (IÂ´m thinking of full support for
This is BTW the first letter where I get pissed of but I donÂ´t
how a big company can just forget about another extremely big company
And like I said before I donÂ´t understand why Emagic doesnÂ´t collaborate
like Steinberg and develop stuff to make it work perfectly instead of
dissing a computer company like AMD thatÂ´s a bit stupid in my opinion!
I have also asked Markus about three times now when heÂ´s been online
know wich PC (Pentium are probably the most genrous company woth Emagic)
with all the specs that Emagic have for that why isnÂ´t Emagic then
collaborating on this one???
I still like PCs and as we have seen the development really has been
when it comes to make them music software work under.
So for the 4 th time what PC do you recommend then Emagic????
I want the specs for it soundcard ram size etc!!
And if you are supported by Pentium please support them a bit more and
my what Pentium with what hardware will work perfectly so I can just buy
stuff and play along my music!!
Do You Yahoo!?
Please include [LAM]/[LAW]/[GEN]/[OT] in your subject line <<<<<
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/